Self-Immolating Beijing Protestors were Uyghur, claims “Source”

On Wednesday a car pulled turned into the famous Wangfujing pedestrian shopping street in Beijing. When police officers pulled up to the car to cite a traffic violation, already roused to suspicion by the car’s out-of-town license plate, the people in the vehicle, apparently already doused in gasoline, set themselves on fire in an act of protest whose motives yet remain unclear. 

When news of the act hit the press it triggered a frenzy of speculation as to who the protesters were and why they did it. The National People’s Congress is set to open next week and is often the target of protesters who come to Beijing to air their grievances. Prominently, the date of the protest was the Tibetan New Year, opening the possibility that the protesters were Tibetans expressing discontent with the situation in Tibet. The China Digital Times posted a summary of the various commentaries triggered by the event, along with some pictures, and clearly one can see that despite how sensational the protest itself was, actual information concerning the cause or the participants remained scarce.

The latest by Reuters says that the occupants of the vehicle were a family of Uyghurs, according to information disclosed by an unnamed source at the capital. The father and mother, aged 59 and 58 respectively, are being treated at a local hospital for burn injuries while the son, 28, is in police custody, uninjured. 

The same source claims that the protest was directed at lawmakers and was over a housing dispute. What remains to be disclosed, then, is whether or not there is something uniquely “Uyghur” about the nature of the protest. Was the issue being protested a personal or non-ethnic issue that could’ve happened anywhere else in China, and the Uyghur identity of the protesters was just a coincidental and non-related fact? Or was ethnicity bound up into it all, as if, for example, the “housing issue” being protested was regarding an old Uyghur neighborhood being torn down to make way for a housing development? This distinction is vital, considering factors such as the annual report on human rights issued by the State Department which right off the bat slams the Chinese government for its treatment of minorities in Xinjiang and Tibet.

It’s interesting to keep in mind that this information came from a leak and that government organs have yet to put in a word on the ethnicity or motivations of the protesters. So far, Xinhua and the like have been pretty sparse with the details. That governmental organizations have refused to release any information about the identity or intent of the protesters seems to strongly imply that there is something worth hiding in the eyes of the authorities. In the meantime, we’ll just have to wait for Xinhua to make the next move, or for another helpful “source” to step up and offer a little more info.

Share:
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Haohao
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks

Comments 1

  1. Josh wrote:

    Great article. I’ve been waiting and looking for the motivating factor in all of this as well. I agree that the lack of official information tends to imply there’s something worth hiding.

    Posted 28 Feb 2009 at 10:47 am

Trackbacks & Pingbacks 3

  1. From » Volkskrant neemt de feiten niet zo nauw Smokes ‘n pancakes on 28 Feb 2009 at 6:01 am

    [...] ook wel uit het feit dat China-watchers zich verre van dit verhaal houden. The New Dominion, het eerste weblog dat hier op in gaat, is net zo sceptisch over “de feiten” als ik dan ben. Reuters, en hun niet nader [...]

  2. From The New Dominion » International Trade Plaza in Urumqi on Fire on 06 Mar 2009 at 11:54 am

    [...] firmly in cheek, that there is some sort of "fire" theme going on in Xinjiang – first, self-immolating Uyghurs in Beijing, then, a suicidal arsonist in Beitun, Urumqi’s International Trade Plaza bursts into [...]

  3. From Volkskrant neemt de feiten niet zo nauw on 01 May 2010 at 9:20 pm

    [...] ook wel uit het feit dat China-watchers zich verre van dit verhaal houden. The New Dominion, het eerste weblog dat hier op in gaat, is net zo sceptisch over “de feiten” als ik dan ben. Reuters, en hun niet nader [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *