<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Turkestan Islamic Party Video Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thenewdominion.net/223/turkestan-islamic-party-video-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thenewdominion.net/223/turkestan-islamic-party-video-update/</link>
	<description>a blog about xinjiang</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 05:48:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The New Dominion &#187; Another Video from Turkestan Islamic Party: A Universal Call to the Muslims of the World</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewdominion.net/223/turkestan-islamic-party-video-update/comment-page-1/#comment-1844</link>
		<dc:creator>The New Dominion &#187; Another Video from Turkestan Islamic Party: A Universal Call to the Muslims of the World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenewdominion.net/?p=223#comment-1844</guid>
		<description>[...] of the world, this one has slipped under the radar and has not received as much attention as the last video. As such, we have no convenient intelligence agency with summary translations, and so, unless an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the world, this one has slipped under the radar and has not received as much attention as the last video. As such, we have no convenient intelligence agency with summary translations, and so, unless an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpunkiSpoodle</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewdominion.net/223/turkestan-islamic-party-video-update/comment-page-1/#comment-1780</link>
		<dc:creator>SpunkiSpoodle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenewdominion.net/?p=223#comment-1780</guid>
		<description>Does anyone have this video cached?

It is now gone from YouTube.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone have this video cached?</p>
<p>It is now gone from YouTube.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Porfiriy</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewdominion.net/223/turkestan-islamic-party-video-update/comment-page-1/#comment-1778</link>
		<dc:creator>Porfiriy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenewdominion.net/?p=223#comment-1778</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s taking so long? Well, there&#039;s absolutely no context to the video, so there are hardly any analysis to be made, except for Runninglate&#039;s thoughtful suggestion to take a listen to the accent, which we&#039;ll try to do when we can contact someone who has the ear for that. Other than that, what is there to do? Some shady never-before-heard-of intelligence company has a monopoly on the secret of the video&#039;s origins. The most relevant parts have been translated. Big news agencies are blowing it up as a credible threat without any basis, and some blogs in the backwoods are suggesting it&#039;s a PRC conspiracy, which has no basis - there&#039;s no basis for any sort of conclusion, really, because the video appeared in a vacuum. The only thing we can be certain of is that the video was meant to agitate, which is what we concluded in the last post and is exactly what the video is doing. Until more information is released &lt;i&gt;about&lt;/i&gt; the video itself (as opposed to the content) there&#039;s nothing solid to be said. So the ball&#039;s in &quot;IntelCenter&#039;s&quot; field, but I think they enjoy the spotlight they&#039;re getting by being the sole authority on a video whose details they are deliberately keeping on the DL.

We&#039;ll look into Seyfullah&#039;s accent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s taking so long? Well, there&#8217;s absolutely no context to the video, so there are hardly any analysis to be made, except for Runninglate&#8217;s thoughtful suggestion to take a listen to the accent, which we&#8217;ll try to do when we can contact someone who has the ear for that. Other than that, what is there to do? Some shady never-before-heard-of intelligence company has a monopoly on the secret of the video&#8217;s origins. The most relevant parts have been translated. Big news agencies are blowing it up as a credible threat without any basis, and some blogs in the backwoods are suggesting it&#8217;s a PRC conspiracy, which has no basis &#8211; there&#8217;s no basis for any sort of conclusion, really, because the video appeared in a vacuum. The only thing we can be certain of is that the video was meant to agitate, which is what we concluded in the last post and is exactly what the video is doing. Until more information is released <i>about</i> the video itself (as opposed to the content) there&#8217;s nothing solid to be said. So the ball&#8217;s in &#8220;IntelCenter&#8217;s&#8221; field, but I think they enjoy the spotlight they&#8217;re getting by being the sole authority on a video whose details they are deliberately keeping on the DL.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll look into Seyfullah&#8217;s accent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewdominion.net/223/turkestan-islamic-party-video-update/comment-page-1/#comment-1774</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenewdominion.net/?p=223#comment-1774</guid>
		<description>An-al-y-sis! An-al-y-sis! What&#039;s taking so long?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An-al-y-sis! An-al-y-sis! What&#8217;s taking so long?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spelunker</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewdominion.net/223/turkestan-islamic-party-video-update/comment-page-1/#comment-1765</link>
		<dc:creator>Spelunker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenewdominion.net/?p=223#comment-1765</guid>
		<description>The English translation that I saw at Global Voices Online has Seyfullah saying he will be &quot;focusing on eight cities that are going to hold Olympic games&quot;

http://globalvoicesonline.org/2008/07/26/china-unheard-of-turkestan-islamic-party-claims-recent-bombings

However I have pointed out that there are only 7 cities hosting the Olympics and Kunming is not one of them.  This error and other reasons lead to my conclusion that the amateur video (and the alleged T.I.P.) has nothing to do with the bus explosions in Kunming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The English translation that I saw at Global Voices Online has Seyfullah saying he will be &#8220;focusing on eight cities that are going to hold Olympic games&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://globalvoicesonline.org/2008/07/26/china-unheard-of-turkestan-islamic-party-claims-recent-bombings" rel="nofollow">http://globalvoicesonline.org/2008/07/26/china-unheard-of-turkestan-islamic-party-claims-recent-bombings</a></p>
<p>However I have pointed out that there are only 7 cities hosting the Olympics and Kunming is not one of them.  This error and other reasons lead to my conclusion that the amateur video (and the alleged T.I.P.) has nothing to do with the bus explosions in Kunming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Runninglate</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewdominion.net/223/turkestan-islamic-party-video-update/comment-page-1/#comment-1760</link>
		<dc:creator>Runninglate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 03:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenewdominion.net/?p=223#comment-1760</guid>
		<description>In your analysis of the speech, can you by the speaker&#039;s accent which part of Xinjiang he may be from?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In your analysis of the speech, can you by the speaker&#8217;s accent which part of Xinjiang he may be from?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: So China has Islamic Terrorists Now? &#171; One-Eyed Panda&#8217;s Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewdominion.net/223/turkestan-islamic-party-video-update/comment-page-1/#comment-1756</link>
		<dc:creator>So China has Islamic Terrorists Now? &#171; One-Eyed Panda&#8217;s Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenewdominion.net/?p=223#comment-1756</guid>
		<description>[...] The New Dominion is reporting that the video is in Uyghur not Arabic (see the comment below). Their site is also saying the video has been reported by Xinhua and AFP. Possibly related posts: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The New Dominion is reporting that the video is in Uyghur not Arabic (see the comment below). Their site is also saying the video has been reported by Xinhua and AFP. Possibly related posts: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
