<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Xinjiang Links Galore.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thenewdominion.net/140/xinjiang-links-galore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thenewdominion.net/140/xinjiang-links-galore/</link>
	<description>a blog about xinjiang</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:51:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Porfiriy</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewdominion.net/140/xinjiang-links-galore/comment-page-1/#comment-2657</link>
		<dc:creator>Porfiriy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 01:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenewdominion.net/?p=140#comment-2657</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the complements, Bruce, but we&#039;re quite content with being just a &quot;blog&quot; if being &quot;more authoritative&quot; means risking the whole endeavor by being careless with our identities. If our goal is as simple as providing more thought-provoking information on Xinjiang, then that goal is better accomplished by doing such work for a long time and not being taken &quot;seriously&quot; by a certain amount of people as opposed to writing for a short period of time but then getting kicked out of China or barred from enter to China or something to that effect.

And I can&#039;t speak for Opkehessip but frankly I totally disagree with the concept that authoritativeness has anything at all to do with identity or credentials. After all, Einstein didn&#039;t have a Ph.D. when he crafted several of his unprecedented theories and he was scorned by some for that. But was he right? Naturally, we are definitely no &quot;Einsteins&quot; of Xinjiang Studies but if our information is correct and makes sense then it should be considered authoritative and if the information is incorrect and doesn&#039;t make sense it is not authoritative. Guess I&#039;ve been spending too much time on Wikipedia. If we are in Xinjiang, our posts will reflect that quality. If we aren&#039;t in Xinjiang, then we would be absolutely delighted if people in Xinjiang commented on our blog to correct information or to clarify things. In fact, I rather like the fact that we&#039;re a blog. We&#039;re open to making mistakes, to speculating, to enjoying a measure of flexibility offered by being anonymous, and to active participation and criticism by readers in the comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the complements, Bruce, but we&#8217;re quite content with being just a &#8220;blog&#8221; if being &#8220;more authoritative&#8221; means risking the whole endeavor by being careless with our identities. If our goal is as simple as providing more thought-provoking information on Xinjiang, then that goal is better accomplished by doing such work for a long time and not being taken &#8220;seriously&#8221; by a certain amount of people as opposed to writing for a short period of time but then getting kicked out of China or barred from enter to China or something to that effect.</p>
<p>And I can&#8217;t speak for Opkehessip but frankly I totally disagree with the concept that authoritativeness has anything at all to do with identity or credentials. After all, Einstein didn&#8217;t have a Ph.D. when he crafted several of his unprecedented theories and he was scorned by some for that. But was he right? Naturally, we are definitely no &#8220;Einsteins&#8221; of Xinjiang Studies but if our information is correct and makes sense then it should be considered authoritative and if the information is incorrect and doesn&#8217;t make sense it is not authoritative. Guess I&#8217;ve been spending too much time on Wikipedia. If we are in Xinjiang, our posts will reflect that quality. If we aren&#8217;t in Xinjiang, then we would be absolutely delighted if people in Xinjiang commented on our blog to correct information or to clarify things. In fact, I rather like the fact that we&#8217;re a blog. We&#8217;re open to making mistakes, to speculating, to enjoying a measure of flexibility offered by being anonymous, and to active participation and criticism by readers in the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewdominion.net/140/xinjiang-links-galore/comment-page-1/#comment-2654</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 23:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenewdominion.net/?p=140#comment-2654</guid>
		<description>Like Swan above, I too would like to know who is &quot;running the show.&quot; Your commentary is intelligent and thought provoking, but not knowing your nationality, location or role in Xinjiang -- I assume you are there -- means the site comes off as a blog rather than something potentially more authoritative. 

Nonetheless, a good read and informative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Swan above, I too would like to know who is &#8220;running the show.&#8221; Your commentary is intelligent and thought provoking, but not knowing your nationality, location or role in Xinjiang &#8212; I assume you are there &#8212; means the site comes off as a blog rather than something potentially more authoritative. </p>
<p>Nonetheless, a good read and informative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Porfiriy</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewdominion.net/140/xinjiang-links-galore/comment-page-1/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>Porfiriy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenewdominion.net/?p=140#comment-546</guid>
		<description>This site is located... IN A SERIES OF TUBES CALLED THE INTERNETS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This site is located&#8230; IN A SERIES OF TUBES CALLED THE INTERNETS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swan</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewdominion.net/140/xinjiang-links-galore/comment-page-1/#comment-534</link>
		<dc:creator>swan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenewdominion.net/?p=140#comment-534</guid>
		<description>Hi i&#039;m the new kid on the block and so just wanted some info on the site.Is it located in Xinjiang or Canada? Not that it makes much difference as it is full of wonderful stuff on uyghurs!The &#039;opposite end of China&#039; i can see who&#039;s running the show, this site i can&#039;t.Help, show me yourself OH GREAT ONE!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi i&#8217;m the new kid on the block and so just wanted some info on the site.Is it located in Xinjiang or Canada? Not that it makes much difference as it is full of wonderful stuff on uyghurs!The &#8216;opposite end of China&#8217; i can see who&#8217;s running the show, this site i can&#8217;t.Help, show me yourself OH GREAT ONE!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Porfiriy</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewdominion.net/140/xinjiang-links-galore/comment-page-1/#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>Porfiriy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 13:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenewdominion.net/?p=140#comment-493</guid>
		<description>Ack, you&#039;re right. Better change that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ack, you&#8217;re right. Better change that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chinawatcher</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewdominion.net/140/xinjiang-links-galore/comment-page-1/#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator>Chinawatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 12:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenewdominion.net/?p=140#comment-492</guid>
		<description>Nice compilation of articles. However...
Your characterisation of Professor James Millward&#039;s article as &quot;containing advice on how world leaders should tactfully and effectively approach China&quot; appears to be flawed. As I understand it, Prof Millward&#039;s advice was directed at China - how it could manage its image better by &quot;being confident and honest, not defensive and secretive.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice compilation of articles. However&#8230;<br />
Your characterisation of Professor James Millward&#8217;s article as &#8220;containing advice on how world leaders should tactfully and effectively approach China&#8221; appears to be flawed. As I understand it, Prof Millward&#8217;s advice was directed at China &#8211; how it could manage its image better by &#8220;being confident and honest, not defensive and secretive.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
